Freud said, “Dreams are Royal Road to Unconsciousness & deepest thoughts of the unconscious wishes and desires of a person. Few dreamers they dream with a more negative state of mind and feeling than control subjects, and additionally more disappointments and adversities (contrasted with schizophrenics). Patients with depression additionally encounter more successive bad dreams. Suppressed emotions will lead them to dream more with negative content. (http://dreampsychology.in/freudian-dream-interpretation-and-analysis/). Freud says all suppressed and wishful desires form in the form of thoughts it leads them to dream more. Freud in his works he speaks about libido, he says humans always focus on “pleasure principle”. People always seek pleasure in their life.

Freud described dream-work is an unconscious unraveling task that converts the latent content into the manifest content. While interpreting the dream work follows in reverse order, from the manifest content to the latent content. The dream work means what permits the dream images to get precedent relations or past events. It may reveal the peculiar form of future events also. Freud stated that dream-work means “The essence of Dreaming”

Freud quoted about dream work:

“Everyone has wishes which he would not like to tell others, which he does not want to admit even to himself.” “Freud said to Putnam: “We are what we are because we have been what we have been.” “The dream is the (disguised) fulfillment of a (suppressed, repressed) wish.”

 Gruppe discusses such a characterization of dreams, referring to Macrobius and Artemidorus: “Dreams were separated into two classes; the five stars was accepted to be impacted just by the present (or the past), and was insignificant in regard without bounds; it incorporated the enuknia (sleep deprivation), which straightforwardly replicate a given thought or its inverse; e.g., yearning or its satiation; and the phantasmata, which expand the given thought fantastically, as e.g. the bad dream, ephialtes. The useless of dreams, then again, was determinative without bounds. To this had a place: 

1. Coordinate predictions got in the dream (chrematismos, oraculum); 
2. The predicting of a future occasion (orama, visio); 
3. The typical dream, which requires translation (oneiros, somnium.) 

This hypothesis made due for a long time.” 

Associated with these differing estimations of the dream was the issue of “dream-translation.” Dreams all in all were relied upon to yield critical arrangements, however not each dream was promptly comprehended, and it was difficult to make certain that a specific immense dream did not by any means prognosticate something of significance so that an exertion was made to supplant the endless substance of the dream by something that ought to be on the double fathomable and noteworthy. In later relic, Artemidorus of Daldis was viewed as the best power on dream interpretation. His exhaustive works must serve to remunerate us for the lost works of a comparable nature. 

The pre-logical origination of the dream which got among the people of old was, obviously, in impeccable keeping with their general origination of the universe, which was acclimated to extend as an outer reality that which had reality just in the life of the mind. Assist, it represented the fundamental impression made upon the cognizant existence by the morning memory of the dream; for in this memory the dream, as contrasted and whatever is left of the psychic substance, is by all accounts something outsider, coming, in a manner of speaking, from a different universe. It would be a blunder to assume that hypothesis of the heavenly starting point of dreams needs supporters even in our own particular circumstances; for very separated from pietistic and otherworldly essayists – who stick, as they are superbly defended in doing, to the remainders of the once overwhelming domain of the extraordinary until these leftovers have been cleared away by logical clarification – we not rarely find that very keen people, who in different regards are unwilling from anything of a sentimental sort, go so far as to base their religious faith in the presence and co-operation of superhuman profound powers on the baffling way of the wonders of dreams (Haffner). 

The legitimacy credited to the dream-life by specific schools of theory – for instance, by the school of Schelling – is a particular memory of the undisputed confidence in the holiness of dreams which won in olden times; and for a few masterminds, the mantic or prophetic force of dreams is still a subject of verbal confrontation. This is because of the way that the clarifications endeavored by brain science are excessively deficient, making it impossible to adapt to the collected material, however emphatically the logical mastermind may feel that such superstitious principles ought to be revoked. 

To compose unequivocally the historical backdrop of our logical information of the dream-issue is greatly troublesome, on the grounds that, profitable however this learning might be in sure regards, no genuine advance in a distinct bearing is so far recognizable. No genuine establishment of confirmed outcomes has up to this point been built upon which future agents may keep on building. Each new creator approaches similar issues anew, and from the earliest starting point. If I somehow happened to specify such creators in sequential requests, giving an overview of the sentiments which each has held concerning the issues of the dream, I ought to be very not able to draw an unmistakable and finish photo of the current situation with our insight on the subject. I have subsequently wanted to construct my strategy for treatment in light of topics as opposed to on creators, and in endeavoring the arrangement of every issue of the dream I should refer to the material found in the writing of the subject. 

Be that as it may, as I have not prevailed with regards to acing the entire of this writing – for it is generally scattered, and joined with the writing of different subjects. As of not long ago most creators have been slanted to manage the subjects of rest and dreams in conjunction, and together with these they have usually managed practically equivalent to states of a psycho-neurotic nature, and other dream-like wonders, for example, pipedreams, dreams, and so forth. In late works, then again, there has been an inclination to keep all the more nearly to the topic, and to think about, as an extraordinary subject, the different issues of the dream-life. In this change, I ought to jump at the chance to see an outflow of the developing conviction that edification and understanding in such cloud matters might be accomplished just by a progression of nitty-gritty examinations. Such an itemized examination, and one of a unique mental nature, is clarified in these pages. I have had little event to fret about the issue of rest, as this is basically a physiological issue, in spite of the fact that the adjustments in the practical assurance of the psychic contraption ought to be incorporated into a depiction of the dozing state. The writing of rest will in this manner not be considered here. A logical enthusiasm for the marvels of dreams in that capacity drives us to propound the accompanying issues, which to a specific degree, associate, converge into each other. The reason behind dreaming and knowing about the meaning of dreams is a big task. ( http://dreampsychology.in/what-is-a-dream/).  As per the Freudian theory human dream to satisfy their libido and unconscious mind will reveal a few images through dreams. Understanding Freud’s dream analysis is not at all easy it takes years together.